Also, sometimes the INS spring will fit into one 92FS, and not in another - through some sort of slight frame variation.Īt this point, I don't worry about the INS spring. I would try the reduced weight INS spring - but reports from some claim they work great - and others say that the trigger feels gritty and/or doesn't return right all the time. But, I still go with the recommended change of every 5k. They do not seem to break as often as they used to, I will say that. Its been reported that factory trigger return springs are made of thicker wire than they were in the 1980s and early 1990s. I ended up taking it out and putting the stock trigger spring back. The INS trigger INCREASED the weight of the trigger - back to pre "D" spring weight. I installed one with a metal trigger about 2 years ago. However, its been discussed before - but there seems to be some variation from unit to unit on those INS triggers. The groove in the upper 1/3 of the trigger that is inside the frame is not deep enough.Ĭorrect, you must find an old school all metal trigger to make thatw ork. The Wolff TCU will not work with a standard 92 / M9 Commercial trigger. With these units you need the standard US GI trigger than is sold at most surplus parts stores. However, the only time it WILL become an issue is if you decide to switch out the standard trigger spring for a Wolff Trigger Conversion Unit which greatly reduces the trigger pull. I think the standard serrations on the front and back strap give a better grip. The checkering is rather shallow - so its not nearly as grippy as checkering on a 1911. And, while others may disagree - I personally like the regular front and rear strap serrations over the checkering on the M9A1. There is also finally aftermarket night sights for the 92A1 from Trijicon now.
I also personally find the 92A1 is my second fav Beretta 92 variant - right behind the standard 92FS (which balances the best 1 handed, IMHO). Also, the 92A1 balances the best in a 1 handed grip out of any of the railed models. This is a such better choice to the 90-TWO, IMHO.
The gun is available in 9mm and 40 cal (the 96A1), and the 9mm version comes with THREE 17 round factory mags (the same mags that come with the 90-Two). In addition - the slide is a little bit beefier than a standard 92 slide.
Paises q mas usan whatsapp 2018 pro#
The guiderod is also captured (which is a pro or con, depending on who you ask). The trigger guard is curved however, like that of the 90-Two. The 92A1 (and 96A1) will use standard Beretta 92 grips.
The rail, internal recoil buffer and dovetailed front sight (all great changes), and puts it into a more "normal" 92 frame. This design takes some of the best aspects of the 90-Two. I tried several solutions to this issue, but found none worthwhile)ĩ2A1 - Newest release of the 92 - Released in the summer of 2010. (I personally do not like the polymer grip - too slippery. The gun comes with factory 17 round mags (in 9mm) There is hardly any aftermarket support, and the lack of aftermarket grips is really hurting sales. This gun will be in limited production for 2011 (so get one now if you want one). While the gun is not polymer, it does come with a polymer, slip on grip. Several of the small parts are totally different from the standard 92 design (hammer, mag release, trigger bar, slide safety switches). The guiderod is captured, and there is a recoil buffer built into the frame. 90-Two - Commonly known as the "90-Dash-Two" or "The Dash." This is a redesigned version of the 92FS that came out in 2006.